James' Story

I have not posted on here in a very long time, could not think of my next piece. I am thinking of starting this blog again, less of just trying to provide smoking gun evidence and more of just general information and maybe some audios. The main issue with joining people’s audios is that almost everyone in this community is either American or Canadian (maybe too many Canadians……:P). Therefore the time zone differences screw me to try and participate in the calls.

So I am sitting on a train, so I am going to give some information on my story. A lot of people go on about their awaking, and how it was a gradual process to eventually finding the ‘truth’. Mine was a bit different.

I will take you back to September of 2012. It was coming up to the 11^th anniversary of 9/11 and every year I looked into it for that day, just to see what people were talking about. Sometimes it was ‘conspiratorial information’ but nothing ever really made sense to me, there were always too many issues and flaws with the evidence and story they were providing. But I mostly read information about the official story, so my views were that maybe Bush knew, but the official story was pretty much correct.

So on the 9^th of September 2012 I was looking round the internet and found some John Lear videos, and he was talking about the moon and crazy space missions that NASA was taking part in secretly. I listened to about 10 hours of his audio and found it all very interesting but didn’t really believe it. I thought he may have some truth as why would he lie. Then he mentioned that on 9/11 holograms were used, and I thought he was absolutely nuts, so I stopped listening. My views on the subject didn’t change.

I had a little google on the 10^th and searched for this hologram theory, just because I thought it was interesting but didn’t really understand what it was or what it actually meant. So after searching I found a guy called Richard D Hall, he was promoting this hologram theory. The reason why I listened to him because he was from the same city as I am. I watched a few of his videos, and didn’t really believe any of it, and really struggled to understand it, I was thinking, why would they be using holograms for anything, as planes hit the buildings. He didn’t explain it well so I moved on from that theory. And once again, my views didn’t change and thought that ‘conspiracy theorists’ were crazier than I thought.

So, the next day came, 11^th of September 2012. I was wanting to look at some conspiracy information that had a bit more merit and was more factual. Where did I go for this information you ask? Where else but Wikipedia! I went on Wikipedia on the ‘9/11 Conspiracy Theories’. There were a lot of sections, but something caught my eye.

It was the ‘No-Plane Theory’. I instantly thought this was both the funniest and stupidest thing I had ever seen. (As you can see, I made no connection to the no plane theory and the hologram theory). I  googled the theory because I wanted to find what these people had s evidence just because I thought it was so wrong, and so stupid. This was start of the most shocking two hours of my life.

I googled it, but then decided I wanted to watch a video of it. The video I found was called September Clues by Simon Shack. I started watching just so I could get some of the points and then laugh at it then move on.

I remember watching it vividly to this day, my jaw was dropped, all I had to do was watch it once and everything clicked. Every issue I had with all the conspiracy were answered by this video. At the time, it left absolutely no stone unturned and answered every question I had at the time. I immediately believed it, the information was solid, and it had no holes.  In two hours my world was turned upside down. It went from the ‘TV told the truth and showed it how it was’, to ‘they edited planes into the footage to make you think there was planes, they used CGI/greenscreen to fake footage and they faked witnesses.’

I went from official story is properly correct to there were no planes on 9/11 in 2 hours. Some people said this took them months or years to get there. By pure luck I was able to find out the truth (key parts of it anyway) in 2 hours. So 11 years after 9/11 it was relieved to me how it was actually done. After watching it, I found the September Clues website and CluesForum. I spent 2 weeks straight reading everything on that site. I found out that almost everything was fake on that day. But before I watch September Clues I never once, I repeat never once, thought that video evidence could be faked, and how wrong I was.

Anyway, its been over 2 years since that day and my views haven’t really changed but more have expanded on this concept. I have realised that 9/11 was the tip of the iceberg in  this world, the method of faking footage and events is deeper and darker than I could have every realised. This was mostly because of a link I found in clues form. The first is Fakeologist (then known as wake up with Ab), who dealt with 9/11 almost exclusively, then through him I found Markus Allen, then through him I found Chris Kendall. With these two I found out more about this world, the system, fakery, and everything in between. Hopefully I will start adding to this blog soon, but there is a bit of background information on my awaking process. It took a day, and it was a hell of a day.

Please comment with your stories. Keep them as long or as brief as you wish.

9/11 Nose In and Out

Nose In

This is a video of a Jet crashing into a concrete wall, at 500 mph. 

This is a video of a 'plane' crashing into a side of a building which had high-strength, load-bearing perimeter 59 14-inch wide steel columns, which where mixture of 12 different types of steel with yield points between 42,000 pound per square inch and 100,000 psi. These were also spaced closely together to form a strong, rigid wall structure, and the 9 floors that flowed between the supporting walls and interior columns were made from 52 by 0.5  inch thick steel slabs covered in 4 inches of concrete  at 500 mph.

These both look pretty similar, both planes being completely destroyed the object it is hitting. According to howstuffworks.com, this outer wall had some 'major advantages. First of all, it gave the building remarkable stability. In addition to shouldering some of the vertical load (the weight of the building), the outer steel columns supported all of the horizontal forces acting on the tower (the force of the wind). This meant the inner support structure was completely dedicated to the huge vertical loads.' This means that the outer wall of both WTC's were not standard walls, these were designed carry some of the weight of the building and the immense force of the wind. These were not standard sky-scraper walls.

Look at the picture below to get a good grasp of how thick and wide these steel columns are. 

Hopefully I have established that the walls of the World Trade Center were very strong, and should have fared well against an aluminum plane. But as well all know from that day, it did not. here is the aftermath of the plane's impact. The aluminum plane has completely sliced through the steel, like a hot knife through butter. 

Although, this is not a hot knife through butter. As the video shows, this a very flimsy and thin tube which crashed into a steel building.  Really look at 0:48, and look how thin the plane actually is. The plane should have been completely destroyed and the building should have been basically fine. But the image below tells a different story.  

Not only did the main tube of the aircraft cut through the building, which is completely crazy, the wings of the plane also cut through the steel. Please watch the video above and below and pay attention to the wings. There is no way they could have cut through the steel, they would have either been completely destroyed on impact, or fell off.

The plane cuts through the building. The building should cut through the plane. Does the image below look real? If you think that's the plane being pulverized by the building, then yes. But that's not what happened, the plane CUT through the building and left a gaping hole. The main  fuselage of the plane and the wings cut through. Madness.

NO WAY THAT'S REAL!

Nose Out

Hopefully I have proved that the plane entering the building the way it did is pretty much impossible. But my post does not end there. Now we have the nose out. Please watch the video below and see what comes out of the right of the building once the plane enters.

You cannot really make it out. But when watching the video frame by frame it has been determined that something exits the building. Below I have selected 6 frames of the plane's nose before the impact, and 6 frames of the object which has exited the plane. 

I am trying to show that the plane exited the building. The height of the fuselage of the plane is about 10 pixels on the screen I am using. This is before the plane impacted with the building. The object which has exited the building is also about 10 pixels also. 

This means that this aluminum plane managed to firstly enter the building, which hopefully I have proved it is pretty impossible. Then crashed through the inner core of the building, I will explain the structure of the core further down. And finally it crashes through the other wall of the building, which is the same as the first wall, but at a massively reduced speed. This should impossible, as the plane should have not been able to properly penetrated the wall of the building when 'travelling at 500 mph', never-mind once the plane has suffered massive deceleration after supposedly crashing through the building.

People have stated this is the engine of the plane which crashed through, but I can quickly prove that is not correct.

The image on the right shows the engine, with the line over the top of it. It is around about 50% smaller than the object which exits the building, therefore it has to be the nose of the plane and not the engine.

I will now show some images of the inner cores of the buildings. These inner cores are made up of 47 heavy steel columns and 'Some of these columns were very large, with cross-sections measuring 14 inches wide by 36 inches deep'. 

Conclusion

There is no way that the plane's should have been able to cut through the buildings, then destroy the inner core, and in WTC2's case exit out the other side. These are two official images from the FEMA report on 9/11. This shows that the planes cut through the steel. WTC1 was easily penetrated by plane, and it's wings (lol). According to this image the plane cut through around 34 steel columns and 10 floor columns. This is around 1000 inches of steel which the plane sliced through... ((34*14)+(10*52)=996)...and then multiple 14*36 inch steel inner core columns.

Link

According to this image the plane cut through around 19 steel columns and 7 floor bars. This is around 800 inches of steel which the plane sliced through... ((19*14)+(10*52)=786)...and then sliced through multiple 14*36 inch steel inner core columns and the other wall..

Link

Here is some food for thought. This is an image of 737 after the nose was struck by a bird at 500 mph. Imagine this plane being stuck by a 1000 inch slab of steel and concrete, then a series of 14*36 inch steel posts, then another 1000 inch slab of steel and concrete at 500 mph, I will give you a hint, it will not slice right though it ;)

Link

9/11 - Plane Speed

9/11 did not happen how we were told. I believe that 9/11 was a Psyop, also known as a  Psychological Operation. This was achieved by using Media Fakery. There were no terrorists and no planes, all I know is that two buildings (and a few more) are now gone. The live footage we were shown on 9/11 were prefabricated, meaning it was not live, and it was not real. 

Abirato has a good summary of what happened, and I agree with his 9/11 Psyop bullet points. 

I would highly recommend reading that page before continuing on with my blog post. 

Today we are going to look at some 'Live' footage shown on 9/11 of the second plane hitting the second tower. Link below.

Youtube Video of 2nd Crash

I am going to quickly discuss some of the other issues with this footage. 

Firstly, there are three zooms, and just after the final zoom, a plane comes into view and hits the towers. Pretty dramatic stuff. I wonder what the odds of that are? Catching the iconic shot just after the final zoom brings the camera as close at it can go. Nice little coincidence.

Secondly, just at the quality of the video, this includes the buildings, the plane, the smoke, the skyline, does that look real? This was 2001, the camera on news helicopters were much better than a stand hand held camera. Yet compare the video of the second crash to this Manhattan helicopter ride in 1999, especially from 4:35.

Left image taken from a helicopter video camera in 2001
Right image taken a hand held video camera in 1999
Only one of these images looks like a poorly made CGI version of New York....which one is it?

This third issue ties in with my main point. The plane was supposedly travelling at 510 knots, 'As the aircraft made its final descent to 1000 feet, it accelerated and impacted World Trade Center tower #2 at approximately 510 knots ground speed.'. According to Wikipedia and Boeing the cruise speed is 470 knots, 530 mph at 35,000 ft cruise altitude and the maximum cruise speed is 493 knots, 567 mph at 35,000 ft cruise altitude. This means the plane was travelling faster than its maximum cruising speed at ground level, which is impossible. Reason why I believe the plane was said to be going at this speed was to explain the 'nose out'. If you are not familiar with the nose out concept, please watch this video. 

Now onto the main point of this. Lets assume the plane is able to go at that speed at ground level, so at the impact the speed of the plane is 510 knots. It takes the plane 6 frames to travel its own length at 510 knots.

I then superimposed the image on the right, without the red circle, on top of the wide shot by Chopper 5. The wide shot is 237 frames before the close plane shot. 237/6 = 39.5. On the wide shot I placed 39 markers to show where the planes position should be. The plane is not there.

If there was a plane travelling at the speed it claimed to travelling at, the plane should be on the right of that last red bar. This is assuming the 'terrorists' got the plane up to top speed at least 30 seconds prior to impact, the furthest the plane could be away from the towers is after that red line. If the 'terrorists' were increasing in speed of the plane, and just before impact the plane reach top speed, then the plane should be visible somewhere along the black and red line. If you find a plane in this image.

Left image 0:25 and right image is 0:28 on video of second crash

Should there be this many discrepancies in a 30 second live shot if the video was real? No. The reason why there are these issues with the video is because it is a fake video. The Hollywood style drama in the zooms, the poor quality of the video, buildings, scenery, the impossible plane speeds and the lack of plane... 

9/11 was a big lie, and the media showed us a poorly made film. 

No Blood In Boston

This is my first blog post, and hopefully this will open some eyes to how obviously fake the 'Boston Bombing' was. Below is some of the images of Jeff Bauman which I am sure we have all seen.

Both his legs have been blown clean off, and the guy is just chillin' in that wheelchair. Certainly cool as a cucumber under unimaginable pain. He should be either in shock, or dead, but he is just sitting there. Also there is no blood, both legs blown off, and NO BLOOD, that is crazy. If this photo is real, then there should be A LOT of blood. I am no doctor, but I know there are major arteries in leg, such as the femoral artery.  You would bleed out in about a minute if you were lucky. His legs are not elevated, so even gravity should be causing blood to drip, never mind his heart pumping the blood out of his lack of legs. 

Here is another image of Jeff Bauman, this is meant to be a few seconds after the blast, you can clearly see his left leg has been blown off. It is also held above the woman's head. She is wearing a white T-shirt of some description, and yet there no blood on her or her clothes. This shows that there was no blood coming from the leg after a few seconds of the massive wound. So there is little to no blood  in these 3 photos. Lets look at some real videos to compare, surely there should be no blood in any of these videos...

The first video is from a Ice Hockey game, according to wikipedia the 'skate caught Marlarchuk on the neck, severing his jugular vein'. As you can clearly see, there is MASSIVE amounts of blood almost immediately after the impact.  Despite the low quality of the video, you can see the blood clearly on the white ice. If the Jeff Bauman photos were real, you should be able to see the blood on the white clothes of the women or trailing behind him in the wheelchair, or all over himself and the cowboy, but there is NO BLOOD.

This second video is from a wrestling match. To understand why I am using this, please first read this. 'Blading is a term used in professional wrestling and refers to the practice of deliberately cutting oneself (on the forehead) to achieve the visual effect of bleeding.  Blading is classed as a particularly taboo subject in wrestling, and is usually considered one `not to talk about`. This is due largely to the fact that most people do not believe that any blood split during a wrestling match is real. Blading is done with a small piece of razor blade partially wrapped in tape. The blade is stashed away before the match, either in the trunks, boots, under the wrist tape. or in some cases taped to the finger. Once a wrestler needs to blade himself after he has taken a large hit, he can do this while he is on the floor, all he needs to do is move his hand over his face and then he can do it. (Blading Link at bottom of page)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMzFsKRgBg4 - This is the video

As you can see from the video, he is hit by the chair, goes under the ring announcers table, blades himself, them comes back out. But he did it too deep. Look at the amount of blood, it is a similar amount of the hockey video.  The blood flows instantly, and in large quantity.

Image from video

Image from later in the match

You can clearly see the blood all over the white ring and his face/body, it is clearly visible. This is several minutes after the original blade, and he is still bleeding. Unlike the Bauman images, where immediately after the blast he is not bleeding, and minutes (I assume it is only 1/2 minutes after, as if it was any longer, he would have bled out) after when he is in the wheel chair, he has stopped bleeding. Even though that injury is much more extreme that the wrestlers blading, or the hockey throat cut, there is considerably less blood i.e NO BLOOD.

In short, the Jeff Bauman images CAN NOT BE REAL. Whether this is CGI, or some sort of 'stage-makeup'. There has to be blood, the injury is extremely bad, as there is no blood. The wrestling video is due to a razor blade to the forehead, and there is A LOT of blood. The Hockey injury was a life threatening injury caused by a ice stake and there was MASSIVE amounts of blood. The Jeff Bauman injury should have been a death sentence and was caused by standing next to a bomb and there was NO BLOOD.

THOSE IMAGES CAN NOT BE REAL

First Image - http://axiomamnesia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/boston-man-with-legs-blown-off.jpg

Second Image - http://storage0.dms.mpinteractiv.ro/media/1/2181/25666/10759176/13/166665888-10.jpg?width=990

Third Image - http://i.imgur.com/5WEw6mm.jpg

Hockey Blood - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icJgO6j1y_E

Blading - http://www.wwe-unsanctioned.co.uk/index.php?pid=1275

Chair Shot Blade/Blood - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMzFsKRgBg4

Image from video - http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/images/photos/001/296/663/21_crop_340x234.jpg?1311964074

Image from later in the match - http://24.media.tumblr.com/YDV8oDn8nm91vp9rXVzWUgxpo1_500.png